I was thinking that suppose a player 1 occupies tc of player 2 who had built a structure (say barrack) and a castle for it . After loosing the tc, these structures remain under player 2. So what if we make a rule that the player 1 cannot build any structure/ castle for the captured tc unless he destroys 1 castle/ structure of player 2? This way one could check the other player's expansion. Other wise it becomes very difficult to re occupy the tc as well as destroy the structures and castles built against it(just my opinion)
How does this sound?
capturin tcs - ANSWERED
Moderator: Endru1241
- TheBluePhoenix
- Posts: 1498
- Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2015 5:09 pm
capturin tcs - ANSWERED
BEWARE!!!!The long lost empire of phoenicia is rising- The world is but just near the golden age,wherein men played and frolicked,without any worries at all
- Alexander82
- Posts: 6741
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2015 8:18 pm
Re: capturin tcs
it seems too tricky... and we can't, in fog maps, take count of how many tc,s/factories/castles a player have
Age of Fantasy design leader
- TheBluePhoenix
- Posts: 1498
- Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2015 5:09 pm
Re: capturin tcs
We dont have to. Simple rule- if you capture a tc , you can build a structure only after destroying 1 of the same player. Same for castle. If the player doesnot have any, or maybe less than max possible value then he is allowed to build else not
BEWARE!!!!The long lost empire of phoenicia is rising- The world is but just near the golden age,wherein men played and frolicked,without any worries at all
Re: capturin tcs
I personally prefer it the way it is at the moment. I think this would get a little annoying after a while. 

-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9667
- Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2014 9:28 pm
Re: capturin tcs - ANSWERED
i agree, it would over-complicate game.